PE&RS February 2018 Full - page 86

damage. The fine-scale damage detection products described
in this research should provide valuable information to image
analysts and subsequently to emergency response personnel,
as they will allow the detection and delineation, in near real-
time, of specific damage features that could pose a threat to
critical infrastructure. The addition of this actionable informa-
tion to the disaster response process could drastically reduce
the amount of time and resources needed to ensure the safety
and structural integrity of the critical infrastructure surveyed.
The incorporation of this method would add another strong
link in the image chain, and represents a fertile area for further
exploration and development in the fields of both remote
sensing and disaster management (Yamazaki, 2001). Informa-
tion gained through this research could support emergency
management personnel during the response and mitigation
phase after a natural or anthropogenic disaster by increasing
situational awareness through the accurate identification of
damage to critical infrastructure that is automatically gener-
ated in near real-time.
Our future research will involve damage detection using
convolutional neural networks (
CNNS
) and other advanced
machine learning algorithms, by building on the procedures
and successes of the raster processing model. The ability
of
CNNS
to accurately detect and delineate cracks on many
images having different spatial resolutions and orientations,
without extensive preprocessing, makes it attractive for rapid,
post-hazard damage assessment.
Acknowledgments
The work was partially funded by the National Science
Foundation Directorate of Engineering, Infrastructure Man-
agement and Extreme Events (
IMEE
) program (Grant Number
G00010529), United States Department of Transportation (
US-
DOT
) Office of the Assistant Secretary for Research & Technolo-
gy (
OST-R
) Commercial Remote Sensing and Spatial Information
(
CRS&SI
) Technologies Program (Cooperative Agreement Num-
ber
OASRTRS
-14-
H
-
UNM
), and by the Department of Geography
at San Diego State University (
SDSU
). The authors acknowledge
the contributions of Andrew Loerch (
SDSU
), Richard McCreight
of
NEOS
,
LTD
, and researchers at University of New Mexico for
their help in collecting aerial imagery used in this study.
References
Amhaz, R., S. Chambon, J. Idier, and V. Baltazart, 2016. Automatic
crack detection on two-dimensional pavement images: An
algorithm based on minimal path selection,
IEEE Transactions
on Intelligent Transportation Systems
, 17:2718–2729.
Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters, EM-DAT, 2015.
The
International Disaster Database, 2015
, URL:
emdat.be/advanced_ search/index.html
(last date accessed:
13 December 2017). Chrisman, N.R., 1983. Epsilon filtering: A
technique for automated scale changing,
Technical Papers of the
43
rd
Annual Meeting of the American Congress on Surveying and
Mapping
(Vol. 331), Washington, D.C.
Coulter, L., D. Stow, and S. Baer, 2003. A frame center matching
technique for precise registration of multitemporal airborne
frame imagery: Methods and software approaches
, IEEE
Transactions of Geoscience and Remote Sensing
, 41:2436–2444.
Coulter, L., and D. Stow, 2008. Assessment of the spatial co-
registration of multitemporal imagery from large format digital
cameras in the context of detailed change detection,
Sensors,
8:2161–2173.
Coulter, L., C. Lippitt, D. Stow, and R. McCreight, 2011
.
Near real-
time change detection for border monitoring,
Proceedings from
the ASPRS Annual 2011 Conference
, pp. 1–5.
Coulter, L., D. Stow, S, Kumar, S. Dua, B. Loveless, G. Fraley, C.
Lippitt, and V. Shrivastava, 2012. Automated co-registration of
multitemporal airborne frame images for near real-time change
detection,
Proceedings of the ASPRS 2012 Annual Conference,
Sacramento, California.
Coulter, L.L., D.A. Stow, C.D. Lippitt, and G.W. Fraley, 2015. Repeat
station imaging for rapid airborne change detection,
Time-
Sensitive Remote Sensing
(C.D. Lippitt, D.A. Stow, and L.L.
Coulter, editors), Springer, New York, pp. 13–28.
Cutter, S.L., 2006. GI Science, disasters and emergency management,
Hazards
,
Vulnerability and Environmental Justice
, pp. 399–406.
Dong, L., and J. Shan, 2013. A comprehensive review of earthquake-
induced building damage detection with remote sensing
techniques,
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote
Sensing
, 84:85–99.
Dubois, D., and R. Lepage, 2014. Fast and efficient evaluation of
building damage from very high resolution optical satellite
images,
IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth
Observations and Remote Sensing
, 7(10):4167–4176.
Herold, M., and D. Roberts, 2005. Spectral characteristics of asphalt
road aging and deterioration: Implications for remote-sensing
applications,
Applied Optics
, 44(20):4327–4334.
Lippitt, C.D., D.A. Stow, and K.C. Clarke, 2014. On the nature of
models for time-sensitive remote sensing,
International Journal
of Remote Sensing
, 35(18):6815–6841.
Phinn, S.R., D.A. Stow, J. Franklin, L.A. Mertes, and J. Michaelsen,
2003. Remotely sensed data for ecosystem analyses: Combining
hierarchy theory and scene models,
Environmental Management
,
31(3):429–441.
Quackenbush, L.J., 2004. A review of techniques for extracting linear
features from imagery
, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote
Sensing
, 70(12):1383–1392.
Schott, J.R., 2007.
Remote Sensing: The Image Chain Approach
,
Second edition, New York, Oxford University Press.
Saito, K., R.J. Spence, C. Going, and M. Markus, 2004. Using high-
resolution satellite images for post-earthquake building damage
assessment: A study following the 26 January 2001 Gujarat
earthquake,
Earthquake Spectra
, 20(1):145–169.
Shi, Y., L. Cui, Z. Qi, F. Meng, and Z. Chen, 2016. Automatic road crack
detection using random structured forests,
IEEE Transactions on
Intelligent Transportation Systems
, 17:3434–3445
Storey, E.A., D.A. Stow, L.L. Coulter, and C. Chen, 2017. Detecting
shadows in multi-temporal aerial imagery to support near-real-
time change detection,
GIScience and Remote Sensing
, pp. 1–18.
Stow, D.A., L.E. Tinney, and J.E. Estes, 1980. Deriving land use/
land cover change statistics from Landsat: A study of prime
agricultural land,
Proceedings of the14
th
International Symposium
on Remote Sensing of Environment
, San Jose, Costa Rica.
Stow, D.A., C.D. Lippitt, L.L. Coulter, and B.A. Davis, 2015. Time-
sensitive remote sensing systems for post-hazard damage
assessment,
Time-Sensitive Remote Sensing
(C.D. Lippitt, D.A.
Stow, and L.L. Coulter, editors), Springer, New York, pp. 13–28.
Stow, D.A., L.L. Coulter, G.R. MacDonald, and C.D. Lippitt, 2016.
Evaluation of geometric capture and processing elements in
the context of a repeat station imaging approach to registration
and change detection,
Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote
Sensing
, 82:775–788.
Strahler, A.H., C.E. Woodcock, and J.A. Smith, 1986. On the nature
of models in remote sensing,
Remote Sensing of Environment
,
20(2):121–139.
Talbot, L.M., and B.G. Talbot, 2013. Fast-responder: Rapid mobile-
phone access to recent remote sensing imagery for first
responders,
2013 IEEE Aerospace Conference,
pp. 1–10.
Tralli, D.M., R.G. Blom, V. Zlotnicki, A. Donnellan, and D.L. Evans,
2005. Satellite remote sensing of earthquake, volcano, flood,
landslide and coastal inundation hazards,
ISPRS Journal of
Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
, 59(4):185–198.
Visser, S.J., and A.S. Dawood, 2004. Real-time natural disasters
detection and monitoring from smart earth observation satellite,
Journal of Aerospace Engineering,
17(1):10-19.
Yamazaki, F., 2001. Applications of remote sensing and GIS for
damage assessment,
Structural Safety and Reliability
, pp. 1–12.
Yamazaki, F., K.I. Kouchi, M. Kohiyama, N. Muraoka, and M. Matsuoka,
2004. Earthquake damage detection using high-resolution satellite
images,
IGARSS’04. Proceedings on Geoscience and Remote
Sensing Symposium, 2004
, Vol. 4, pp. 2280–2283.
Zou, Q., Y. Cao, Q. Li, Q. Mao, and S. Wang, 2012. CrackTree:
Automatic crack detection from pavement images,
Pattern.
86
February 2018
PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING & REMOTE SENSING
51...,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85 87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,...114
Powered by FlippingBook