PE&RS December 2018 Full - page 798

consistency, accuracy, and reliability for the entire region. In
this research, it was proved that the theoretical precision of
the drift compensation model can achieve reasonably consis-
tent precision for the entire region, whereas affine compensa-
tion, the most widely used model, depends on lateral overlap.
To deduce the analytical equation of theoretical precision, the
block adjustment was simplified to orientations of stereo pairs
in steps. All tie points were deployed at each corner of the
overlap to achieve the best distribution. Because of cumula-
tive random errors, the standard deviation of affine compen-
sation grew exponentially with the number of stereo pairs,
when the four
GCPs
were deployed at the first stereo pairs. The
growth rate was relative to the overlap. Because of the elimi-
nation of the sample coordinate-related compensation pa-
rameters, the drift compensation model is independent of the
sample coordinates and of the lateral overlap. The standard
deviations of both sample and line coordinates approach
σ
0
and 1.4
σ
0
, respectively, when the number of strips is infinite.
Two experiments were carried out to support this theory.
The first experiment proved that a larger overlap and more tie
points achieve a higher accuracy when four different strate-
gies of tie points are used for block adjustment of two strip
stereo pairs. In the second experiment, five different sets of
GCPs
were used to compare the affine compensation and drift
compensation models. In brief, the block adjustment with af-
fine compensation required four
GCPs
per strip; otherwise, the
geolocation errors would dramatically decrease to the level of
direct orientation. The geolocation errors of drift compensa-
tion were rather consistent when no
GCPs
were involved in
block adjustment. The
RMSE
of the entire block was 2.21 m in
planimetry and 1.53 m in height with four
GCPs
at the corners
of the entire block. Future work may extend the drift compen-
sation model to other satellites with significant system errors,
such as Cartosat-1.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers
for their valuable comments and suggestions to improve the
quality of the paper. This work was supported by, National
Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41701538),
Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (Grant
No. 2017JJ3377), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
funded project (Grant No. 2017T100611), Special Fund for
High Resolution Images Surveying and Mapping Application
System(Grant No.AH1601).
References
Cao, J., X. Yuan, J. Gong, and M. Xu, 2017. Extrapolated
georeferencing of high-resolution satellite imagery based on
the strip constraint,
Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote
Sensing
, 83(7):493–499.
d’Angelo, P., 2013. Automatic orientation of large multitemporal
satellite image blocks,
Proceedings of the Proceedings of
International Symposium on Satellite Mapping Technology and
Application 2013
, Nanjing, pp. 1-6.
Di, K., R. Ma, and R. Li, 2003. Rational functions and potential for
rigorous sensor model recovery,
Photogrammetric Engineering &
Remote Sensing
, 69(1):33-41.
Förstner, W., B. Wrobel, F. Paderes, C.S. Fraser, J. Dolloff, E.M.
Mikhail, and W. Rujikietgumjorn,
2013. Analytical photogrammetric operations,
Manual of
Photogrammetry
, American Society for Photogrammetry and
Remote Sensing, Bethesda, Maryland, pp. 898-948.
Förstner, W. and B.P. Wrobel, 2016. Bundle adjustment,
Photogrammetric Computer Vision
, Springer, Berlin, pp. 670-674.
Fraser, C.S., and H.B. Hanley, 2003. Bias compensation in rational
functions for Ikonos satellite imagery,
Photogrammetric
Engineering and Remote Sensing
, 69(1):53-57.
Fraser, C.S., and H.B. Hanley, 2005. Bias-compensated RPCs for sensor
orientation of high-resolution satellite imagery,
Photogrammetric
Engineering and Remote Sensing
, 71(8):909-915.
Fraser, C.S., G. Dial, and J. Grodecki, 2006. Sensor orientation via
RPCs,
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
,
60(3):182-194.
Grodecki, J., and G. Dial, 2003. Block adjustment of high-
resolution satellite images described by rational polynomials,
Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing
, 69(1):59-68.
Gupta, A., J.S. Naina, S.K. Singh, T. Srinivasan, B.G. Krishnaa,
and P. Srivastava, 2008. Long strip modelling for Cartosat-1
with minimum control,
The International Archives of the
Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information
Sciences
, 37(B1):717-722
Hashmall, J.A., G. Natanson, J. Glickman, and J. Sedlak,
Compensation for time-dependent star tracker thermal
deformation on the Aqua spacecraft,
Proceedings of the 18
th
ISSF
Conference
, 2004, Munich; Germany pp. 9-14.
Hong, Z.H., X.H. Tong, S.J. Liu, P. Chen, H. Xie, and Y.M. Jin, 2015.
A comparison of the performance of bias-corrected RSMs and
RFMs for the geo-positioning of high-resolution satellite stereo
imagery,
Remote Sensing
, 7(12):16815-16830.
Jacobsen, K., 2017. Problems and limitations of satellite image
orientation for determination of height models,
The
International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and
Spatial Information Sciences
, XLII-1/W1:257-264.
Jeong, I., and J. Bethel, 2014. An automatic parameter selection
procedure for pushbroom sensor models on imaging satellites,
Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing
, 80(2):171-178.
Kim, T., H. Kim, and S. Rhee, 2007. Investigation of physical sensor
models for modelling SPOT 3 orbits,
The Photogrammetric
Record
, 22(119):257-273.
Lutes, J., and J. Grodecki, 2004. Error propagation in Ikonos mapping
blocks,
Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing
,
70(8):947-955.
Luthcke, S.B., N.P. Zelensky, D.D. Rowlands, F.G. Lemoine, and T.A.
Williams, 2003. The 1-centimeter orbit: Jason-1 precision orbit
determination using GPS, SLR, DORIS, and Altimeter Data
Special Issue: Jason-1 calibration/validation,
Marine Geodesy
,
26(3-4):399-421.
Massera, S., P. Favé, R. Gachet, and A. Orsoni, 2012. Toward a Global
Bundle Adjustment of SPOT 5–HRS IMAGES,
International
Archrchives for Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial
Information and Science
, XXXIX-B1:251-256.
Noguchi, M., and C.S. Fraser, 2004. Accuracy assessment of
QuickBird stereo imagery,
The Photogrammetric Record
,
19(106):128-137.
Orun, A., and K. Natarajan, 1994. A modified bundle adjustment software
for SPOT imagery and photography: Tradeoff,
Photogrammetric
Engineering and Remote Sensing
, 60(12):1431-1437.
Pan, H., C. Tao, and Z. Zou, 2016. Precise georeferencing using
the rigorous sensor model and rational function model for
ZiYuan-3 strip scenes with minimum control,
ISPRS Journal of
Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
, 119:259-266.
Pan, H., 2017. Geolocation error tracking of ZY-3 three line cameras,
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
, 123:62-74.
Passini, R., and K. Jacobsen, Accuracy investigation on large blocks of
high resolution images,
Proceedings of the ASPRS 2006 Annual
Conference
,
2006
, Reno, Nevada.
Puatanachokchai, C., and E.M. Mikhail, 2008. Adjustability and error
propagation for true replacement sensor models,
ISPRS Journal
of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
, 63(3):352-364.
Ravanbakhsh, M., L.W. Wang, C.S. Fraser, and A. Lewis, 2012.
Generation of the Australian geographic reference image through
long-strip ALOS PRISM orientation,
International Archives
of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information
Sciences
, 39(B1):225-229.
Rottensteiner, F., T. Weser, A. Lewis, and C.S. Fraser, 2009. A strip
adjustment approach for precise georeferencing of ALOS optical
imagery,
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing,
47(12):4083-4091.
798
December 2018
PHOTOGRAMMETRIC ENGINEERING & REMOTE SENSING
743...,788,789,790,791,792,793,794,795,796,797 799,800,801,802,803,804,805,806,807,808,...814
Powered by FlippingBook